Is One Ovulation Tracking Method Better Than Another?

If you’ve been trying to conceive (TTC), you’re probably familiar with tracking ovulation to identify your “fertile window,” which is the 5-6 day period leading up to ovulation. Knowing your peak fertility is key to maximizing your chances of conception. However, tracking ovulation isn’t just useful for TTC—it can also help individuals avoid pregnancy or simply gain insight into their menstrual cycles.

With so many tracking methods available, you might be wondering:

“Is one ovulation tracking method better than another?”

Let’s review the evidence. The effectiveness of each method largely depends on the regularity of your menstrual cycle, and each method, from basal body temperature (BBT) to advanced digital tools, has its pros and cons. I’ll break them down here, and at the end, I’ll share my insight on the most reliable option.

Calendar Method

The calendar method utilizes a woman’s menstrual cycle patterns to predict when ovulation will take place. It is based on the assumption that the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (the two weeks following ovulation) is exactly 14 days, where you subtract 14 days from the length of the menstrual cycle.

For example, if your menstrual cycles are 28 days long, you should ovulate on cycle day 14. If your cycles are 30 days long, ovulation will occur on cycle day 16. The fertile window is the day of ovulation + the 5 days prior to that. So in the second example, the fertile window would be from cycle day 11-16 in a 30 day menstrual cycle). The longer you have been tracking your menstrual cycles, the more accurate this method becomes *IF* you have regular cycles. THIS DOES NOT WORK if you have irregular periods (an indication to see an OBGYN or fertility specialist for evaluation). While the beauty of this method is that it is free, and relatively easy to do, research shows that it is highly inaccurate where it only helps predict ovulation in about 21% of cases!

Basal Body Temperature

Basal Body Temperature (BBT) tracking involves measuring your temperature every morning before getting out of bed. A slight rise in temperature occurs after ovulation due to increased progesterone, allowing you to confirm when ovulation has already occurred. Now these changes are subtle- four-tenths of a degree higher than your usual temperature so you need special thermometers to help track these temperature changes. It’s important to keep in mind that BBT is a reliable way to confirm ovulation *after* it happens. Studies show it can be an accurate indicator of the luteal phase (post-ovulation) but it does NOT predict ovulation, which limits its utility for those trying to conceive quickly or wanting to avoid pregnancy. Another limitation is that BBT can be affected by external factors like sleep, illness, or alcohol consumption. But for anyone who wants to understand cycle patterns over time this can help provide additional insight.

Ovulation Predictor Kits

Ovulation Predictor Kits (OPKs) measure the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in urine, which typically occurs 24-36 hours before ovulation. Because OPKs don’t rely on necessarily following your menstrual pattern over the course of a few months, LH strips are a popular choice among those trying to conceive. Studies have shown that OPKs are around 99% effective at detecting an LH surge, making them one of the most accurate methods to predict ovulation. Unfortunately, it does have an approximate 7% false positive rate. This is frequently seen in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) since it is an endocrine disorder often characterized by elevated circulating LH. In women with PCOS, LH tends to remain elevated at baseline (one of the reasons ovulation may not be occurring in the first place)- to understand this better, check out my post on the menstrual cycle (the foundation of almost everything we discuss regarding female fertility).

Cervical Mucus

Cervical mucus monitoring involves tracking changes in cervical mucus (basically the texture of the vaginal discharge) in the first half of the menstrual cycle. As your estrogen level increases (which correlates to a growing follicle in preparation for ovulation), vaginal secretions become similar in texture to raw egg whites- think clear, slippery and stretchy. The volume of mucus seen peaks around 2-3 days prior to ovulation (ASRM) and intercourse at this time yields higher chances of pregnancy if intercourse occurs on the day of peak mucus. In fact, some studies suggest that women who track cervical mucus can achieve pregnancy at similar rates to those using OPKs. The advantage of tracking cervical mucus is the ability to become more in tune with your bodily changes, it is fairly effective and free. The challenge lies when there is no noticeable cervical mucus as not every woman will have this and lack of cervical mucus does not necessarily mean you aren’t ovulating.

Fertility Awareness Methods

You may have heard about “Fertility Awareness Methods” (FAM) as it has regained popularity given the recent shift to move towards a more “natural” form of contraception. Its main goal is that it can help a woman really understand her own menstrual patterns. It typically involves a combination of the calendar method, BBT and cervical mucus to help predict your fertile window but can also use additional methods like cervical position or fertility tracking apps to maximize accuracy. When done correctly it is a highly effective way to prevent pregnancy or provide a comprehensive insight into your menstrual cycle to help plan for conception with a more holistic approach.

Digital Ovulation Trackers and Wearables

Modern technology is providing ways to help provide more accurate ways to track ovulation by combining data points (BBT) and hormonal changes (via sensors, urine or saliva tests). In general, apps that are not using any sensors can be significantly inaccurate since it cannot take into account cycle to cycle variability but if using urine metabolites of estrogen, progesterone and urine LH, accuracy can approach 99%. The main downside to some of these devices is the associated cost, but if you are dealing with irregular cycles, or have PCOS it can certainly make tracking easier (though arguably, you should seek care from an OBGYN or fertility doctor).

So, Which Ovulation Tracking Method Is Best?

The best ovulation tracking method ultimately depends on personal preference, need and lifestyle, but as a fertility specialist I’m a huge fan of ovulation predictor kits in *most* cases. Clinically speaking, patients who have regular periods are often encouraged to use OPKs to help detect an LH surge and sometimes in the clinical setting, it is correlated with blood LH levels. Blood work in combination with ultrasound imaging is truly the most accurate of all but is really only necessary if there is ovulatory dysfunction and infertility.

Want to learn more? Contact us at 310-943-5820 or email BH_Reception@havingbabies.com or fill out a form today to schedule a consultation!

Sources:

1. Thiyagarajan, K., Basal Body Temperature Method. Reproductive Health, 2016. 2. Soumya, R., & Mahajan, N. Factors Affecting Basal Body Temperature. Fertility & Sterility, 2018.
2. Behre, H. M., et al. Ovulation Prediction Using the ClearPlan Monitor. Human Reproduction, 2000.
3. Johnson S, Marriott L, Zinaman M. Can apps and calendar methods predict ovulation with accuracy? Curr Med Res Opin 2018;34:1587–94.
4. Taylor, A., et al. PCOS and Ovulation Testing. Endocrinology, 2019.
5. ACOG Guidelines on Fertility Awareness, 2021.
6. Bigelow, J. L., et al. Mucus Monitoring for Fertility. Contraception, 2004.
7. Jennings, V., & Sinai, I. Fertility Awareness Effectiveness. Lancet, 2017.
8. Frank-Herrmann, P., et al. Natural Family Planning: Effectiveness and Benefits. Human Reproduction, 2007.
9. Talukder, F., et al. Wearable Devices in Fertility Tracking. Technology in Reproductive Health, 2021.
10. Johnson, S., et al. The Accuracy of Ovulation Prediction Apps. Journal of Women’s Health, 2019.